|

|
Waste Reduction Strategies
Deconstruction and Recycling News
The following news articles have been taken from Smart Growth News
at Smart Growth Online, except where noted.
- Resources on Construction and Demolition Waste
The US Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has recently released its
first report titled Characterization of Building-Related
Construction and Demolition (C&D) Debris in the United States. EPA
estimates building-related C&D debris at 136 million tons per year.
The report breaks this total down into residential and non-residential categories, and by source - construction, renovation, or
demolition. EPA estimates that 65-85% of the C&D waste
stream is landfilled. To order the report call 800-424-9346. Other C&D waste resources
include two documents produced by the National Association of Home
Builders Research Center under a cooperative agreement with the EPA.
A case study titled Deconstruction - Building Disassembly and
Material Salvage: The Riverdale Case Study is available at the Smart
Growth Network web site.
And a guide titled Residential Construction Waste Management: A
Builder's Field Guide is available from the NAHB-RC at 800 898 2842.
- Resource Recycling, Sep 98, p 42, by Ken Sandler.
GreenClips.104.09.23.98
- Deconstruction Key to Maximizing Efficiency
Source: www.architecturemag.com The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reports the gritty
truth: Constructing, renovating, and tearing down residential and
commercial buildings in this country produced almost 136 million
tons of waste in 1996, the equivalent of 2.8 pounds per person per
day. Despite increased recycling, most of the debris still winds up
in landfills, where its sheer volume imposes an enormous
environmental burden. The problem of construction and demolition
(C&D) waste has always taken a back seat to municipal solid
waste—the ordinary garbage produced by households and businesses.
Totals are hard to come by, but according to the EPA report, C&D
waste in the United States amounts to more than half the municipal
waste stream, far exceeding previous estimates.
According to the EPA study, demolition debris makes up 48% of
the C&D waste stream, so leaving existing building components in
place or reinstalling them later on is an obvious way to prevent
waste. One of the latest strategies is the careful dismantling of a
building to maximize the reuse of its materials. Deconstruction can
also be linked to a concurrent construction project to maximize
efficiency. In Portland, Oregon, 92 percent of the waste produced
when several existing structures were torn down to build a new arena
for the Portland Trail Blazers basketball team was recycled.
Concrete, asphalt, metal, drywall, rebar, cardboard, and paper were
either reused in construction or sent to recycling facilities.
Deconstruction currently costs slightly more than demolition, but
savings are expected to increase as contractors gain experience and
the market for used materials grows.
The key to making building reuse economical—and reducing the 44% of C&D waste contributed by renovation debris—is to design
for disassembly. At the simplest level, this strategy involves using
a screw instead of a nail, for example. So far, design for
disassembly has been used most frequently in Europe in response to
extended producer responsibility (EPR) laws that require companies
to take back and recycle their products. In Germany, for example,
the automotive industry pioneered techniques for disassembly that
the construction industry employs. There are currently no such EPR
laws in the United States, but private industry may be forced to
change its practices, as landfills overflow and tipping fees soar.
By the time today's buildings outlive their usefulness, demolition
may no longer be an option.
Gina Goldstein is an editor at INFORM, Inc., a New York-based
nonprofit organization that identifies practical ways to achieve
environmental sustainability. For more information about waste
management visit INFORM's Web site.
- Markets for Deconstructed Wood
Increasing demand for reclaimed lumber in the San Francisco Bay Area
and beyond has strengthened markets for used and remanufactured wood
products and has created the potential for new ones. Re-milled
timbers and beams are typically used as structure in large, high-end
homes and in traditionally joined post-and-beam construction, a
thriving niche market. Re-milled dimensional lumber four inches in
depth and smaller may be the broadest, most promising market but is
still relatively untapped. Using reclaimed wood for flooring,
paneling, and siding turns average-to-difficult stock into fast-
selling products. But millwork shops buying stock for these products
are particular about safety and quality. Many flooring makers are
reluctant to risk their equipment on recovered wood though some use
it exclusively. Finer architectural millwork - moldings, rails,
sills, and trim - requires clear stock without knots, checking, or
fastener marks. Aggressive grading of rough and re-milled stock for
the clearer pieces and techniques like finger jointing could make
architectural millwork from reclaimed stock marketable. For more
information, visit the Materials for the Future Foundation web site. Resource
Recycling, Aug 98, p 15, by Lisa Geller.
GreenClips.102, 08.26.98
- Recycling Construction and Demolition Debris Saves Landfill Space
Facing dwindling capacity, Landfill of Des Moines has extended the
life of its construction and demolition (C&D) debris landfill by
recycling an extensive list of materials. A grant from the Iowa
Department of Natural Resources helped the company - now Central
Construction & Demolition Recycling, Inc. - shift its business
toward recycling. With five of its 23 acres dedicated to recycling,
Central recycled 43% of the 87,038 tons of material it
received last year. Its in-town location is the key attraction to
the company's 300 general contractor and hauler customers, who pay a
$30-per-ton tipping fee. Clean loads of wood and metal go directly
to their own separate areas where a worker removes any odd materials
and buying customers can select what they need. Source-separated
asphalt shingles are shredded for reuse as road base or driveway
blacktop and source-separated drywall - mostly new material rejects
- is reground for use in new product. Mixed loads of asphalt and
concrete, cardboard, metals, and wood go to a 50-foot conveyor for
manual sorting. Asphalt and concrete sell as gravel or material for
new concrete. A tub grinder reduces the wood, removing nails with a
magnet. Central does landfill some materials for lack of markets or,
like some roofing systems, because it can't clean and recycle them
economically. - BioCycle, Oct 98, p 35, by Dave Block.
GreenClips.107.11.04.98
- Armstrong Recycles Ceiling Tiles
Armstrong World Industries now recycles acoustic ceiling tiles from
commercial building renovations, adding the old tiles to the slurry
used for manufacturing new ones. Here's how the new Armstrong
Ceilings Reclamation Program works. The existing ceiling tiles
needn't be Armstrong tiles, just the right kind [mineral fiber
without foil backing]. The replacements, of course, must be
Armstrong tiles. An Armstrong representative and the general
contractor coordinate the logistics of recycling and compare the
cost of landfilling the tiles to the cost of shipping and recycling
them at the nearest Armstrong plant [in Macon, Georgia; Marietta and
Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania; or St. Helens, Oregon]. Depending mainly
on the distance to an Armstrong plant, recycling often, though not
always, saves money. Recycling 230,000 square feet of ceiling panels
from a Portland [Oregon] building, for example, cost $4,550 compared
with $7,500 for landfilling them. Environmental Building News, Nov 98, p 5.
GreenClips.110.12.16.98
- County Tenants Prompt Green Design
King Street Center, a new [327,000-square-foot] Seattle office
building that will house King County's departments of Natural
Resources and Transportation, was designed to optimize the
building's energy efficiency, indoor environmental quality, and
resource conservation systems. The building, nearing completion, is
a joint venture of King County and developer Wright Runstad & Co.
"Green" elements weren't part of a preliminary design from
architectural firm NBBJ, according to County project manager Laurel
Rhoades. But when the County tenants suggested a green building, the
developer, consultants, and subcontractors agreed enthusiastically.
"At every turn we said, 'Is there a different way we can do this?'"
Rhoades says. "It was very informal, and it seemed to work. The
results showed we were willing to work together, and go for
big-ticket items like water reclamation, carpet and lighting." The
lighting, which relies on sweep sensors, occupancy sensors, and
daylight dimmers, operates at only .86 watts per square foot overall
- 28 percent below the maximum allowable under the city's energy
code. In the basement, three giant tanks store rainwater that
supplies 60-80% of the building's water for toilets.
Contractor Lease Crutcher Lewis recycled 80% of construction
debris. Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce, 10 Jun 99, by Jon Savelle.
GreenClips.124.07.14.99
- Pallas Offers Asian-Inspired Eco Wallcoverings
Pallas Walls has developed three new ecological wallcoverings
inspired by the Asian aesthetic of visual simplicity, neutral
colors, and earthy textures. Textile designer Linda Thompson had the
DialTone, Earth Papers, and Alabaster Matte products made in Japan
under its strict residue and emissions laws. The papers are made
with few chemicals. DialTone is 50 to 70 percent recycled Japanese
phone books and 30 to 50 percent pulp. Since the pages are already
tinted, the paper needs only a little dye. Earth Paper blends 65
percent pulp, 25 percent stone powder, and 8 percent straw for a
soft, stucco-like appearance. Alabaster Matte comes from 67 percent
bark infused with linen and mulberry and 33 percent pulp. The papers
work well in corporate conference areas, executive suites, and
hospitality rooms but not in heavy duty corridors, elevators, or
health care facilities. [For more information, call Pallas Walls,
800-472-5527.] - Interiors, Feb 99, p 30, by Katherine Day Sutton.
GreenClips.116.03.24.99
- Reusable Building Materials Exchange
The Reusable
Building Materials Exchange operates as a Web-based bulletin board
where users can post available or sought materials. The Energy
Outreach Center, a nonprofit organization in Washington State,
devised the system that enables local governments anywhere to set up
exchanges. Local government offices or solid waste management
jurisdictions can subscribe to the service on a sliding scale fee
from $1,500 to $2,100 a year, depending on population. Subscribers
receive their own waste exchange bulletin board and marketing
materials to help notify potential users of the service. Any user
can respond to a posting by contacting the poster directly. The
listings offer a good balance of available and sought materials
across a wide range of categories. An "available" posting for used
pressure-treated wood shows the value of such exchanges since reuse
may be the only environmentally viable way to handle this material.
- Environmental
Building News, Oct 98, p 4.
GreenClips.107.11.04.98
- Deconstruction Tested at Fort Ord
The Fort Ord Reuse Authority has dismantled several buildings at the
former US Army base near California's Monterey Bay as part of a
pilot deconstruction project that shows how carefully taking
buildings apart can recover valuable materials for reuse. About
1,200 of Fort Ord's 7,000 buildings don't meet building codes and
contain hazardous materials. Demolishing them and disposing of the
materials, estimates say, would cost well over $100 million. To
study a less expensive and less wasteful alternative, a $200,000
grant from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation funded
deconstruction of four buildings on the base last year. Built in the
1940s, the deconstructed buildings add up to about 11,000 square
feet and include a mess hall or health clinic-type building,
barracks, and garages. The buildings took from ten days to four
weeks each to dismantle. Workers salvaged roof boards, framing
lumber, tongue- and-groove Douglas fir flooring, subflooring, and
unpainted drywall (reclaimed for composting). Exterior siding boards
of Douglas fir are warehoused until an inexpensive way is found to
remove their lead-based paint. "If the boards were clean and
relatively new," says FORA project manager Stan Cook, "they'd be
worth about $4 million." All told, salvagers reclaimed up to 90
percent of the materials. "That's higher than what would be feasible
long-term in the commercial market," notes Dale Stansbury, assistant
dean of economic development at the University of California-Santa
Cruz. "If recovery went down to 75 percent, the cost would be about
half as much. Economic analysis," he explains, "indicates where the
line of demarcation is between deconstruction and demolition." The
project confirmed Stansbury's belief that deconstruction is the best
option in the vast majority of scenarios. Cook evaluates feasibility
by considering, in order, available time, quality of materials, and
volume of materials. - BioCycle, Nov 98, p 46, by Dave Block.
GreenClips.109.12.02.98
- Earthwise Deconstruction
Seattle's Earthwise, Inc. deconstructs homes scheduled for
demolition and markets the salvaged materials at its retail store.
"I had to do something about the massive waste I saw, and having
built houses, taking them down was second nature," says Earthwise
owner and general contractor Kurt Petrauskas who took on his first
deconstruction project four years ago. Today Earthwise's hand
demolition projects range from interior strip-outs to complete
tear-downs that salvage reusable items like cabinets, light
fixtures, windows, studs, exterior siding, and moldings. For one
house, Petrauskas advertised a presale of its more reusable items
and took verbal bids on them as potential buyers walked through the
property. But competing with mechanical demolition on a time and
labor basis is difficult. Though many people would like to
deconstruct, they usually can't afford it except where difficult
access improves its economics. And now that salvaged materials are
more common and owners are beginning to ask for return on the sale
of salvage, Earthwise is shifting its focus toward selective
removal. For more information, phone Earthwise at 206-624-4510. BioCycle, Aug 98, p 30, by Adrienne Pandora Touart.
GreenClips.102, 08.26.98
|